|
CAUTION: Working with fire and/or molten salts can be dangerous and should be attempted only by competent persons. If you choose to attempt any of the experiments or procedures described on this site, you do so solely at your own risk. Testing for Barium & Barite An Experiment in Mineral Chemistry by C. Thorsten Introduction Let us
assume you're
given a mineral sample that came from a nearby quarry. The piece
was
labeled
"barite", but your instructor has asked you to prove if the
identification is correct or not. Suppose the sample
has no
distinct crystals and doesn't lend itself well to hardness testing.
Assume the
only test equipment available is that listed below (i.e., you do not
have a
specific gravity balance handy, and you don't happen to have an
electron
microscopy / EDS setup in your classroom.) Barite or "heavy spar" has some distinct chemical
properties that aid in its identification. Some of these
properties are easy to detect using lab methods from the 19th and early
20th Centuries.Materials carbon block, safety goggles, heavy work gloves, potassium carbonate, potassium nitrate1, potassium bisulfate, propane torch (or alcohol lamp and blowpipe), crucible tongs, test tubes, forceps, spot plate, distilled water, platinum wire, drill (approx. 1/4 to 3/8 inch diameter), droppers. Optional: stereo inspection microscope, long-wave (LW) ultraviolet lamp ("blacklight"), ammonium sulfate (or potassium sulfate or dilute sulfuric acid). Procedure 1.) Carbon blocks are provided with no holes or depressions. While they can be used just as they are, you're less likely to lose a micro-sample if you first drill a very shallow (1/8") depression toward one end of the block. This will hold the assay mixture from being blown away by the torch flame. 2.) Find a place on your "unknown" specimen where it won't be conspicuous to remove a tiny piece-- unless it's just a "test specimen" and you aren't concerned with its aesthetic qualities. With the
forceps (and
the stereo inspection microscope if necessary), remove a couple of tiny
fragments of the mineral you're going to test. If the specimen has any
other
minerals on it, make sure you don't get them along with the sample
fragment. Magnification and a steady hand with the forceps will
help you accomplish this.3.) With the forceps, pick up a single, tiny shard of this mineral and hold it in the burner flame. Don't use up all of your sample - save some for the later steps. If the
sample is barite,
you might get a green flame test at this point. However,
it's
very
possible the sample is contaminated with sodium and other ions,
obscuring the
barium test. Therefore, a lack of a green coloration is not diagnostic
at this
early stage. Furthermore,
solid
barium sulfate doesn't volatilize all that well for flame tests. A
piece of
barite that's been left standing in concentrated sulfuric acid is more
likely
to give a positive flame test, however. 4.) Place the remaining mineral fragments in the depression you've prepared in the charcoal block and set the block on a fireproof lab bench or outside on a dry, gravel or hard-pack dirt surface. Heat the sample with the blowpipe flame. If using a propane torch, take great care not to tilt the business end of the propane canister below the horizontal, or an inferno could result. It is best if the far end of the carbon block is elevated by some fireproof support so that the canister doesn't need to be tilted as much to heat the assay (see diagram, below). Heat the
small fragment
for at least 30 seconds to 1 minute. Observe whether the fragment is
melting or
not (Barite melts at 1580 degrees Celsius; a propane torch flame is
between
about 1600 and 1900 °C, but that's the adiabatic temperature...). If so, turn off the flame and see whether
any
coating developed on the carbon block (2 or 3 cm away from the mineral
fragment), and note the color of this coating while it's still hot. If
the
mineral fragment does not melt by the time the fragment begins
to glow,
turn off the flame and proceed to step 5. Do
Not Touch the carbon block with your hands unless it
has
cooled for at least half an hour or more. Because the carbon block acts as a heat sink, one can get
maximum melting power if the suspected barite sample is held in forceps
in the propane torch flame and the block is not used. Please keep
in mind that those forceps will get hot.
It is also important not to drop that glowing shard somewhere it could
start a fire. While direct heating of a specimen via forceps in a torch
flame seems the obvious choice, it does not allow one to capture any
coatings that might have formed if a block had been used. Such
coatings can be diagnostic for certain minerals. Optional:
When the
fragment cools, check for any fluorescence it may have in long-wave and
short-wave ultraviolet light. Compare this with a known barite sample
treated
in the same manner.5.) Let the block cool for about 10 minutes, and then cover the mineral sample in the depression with about 4 times its volume of powdered potassium carbonate. Light the
torch and heat
in the reducing flame until the sample melts and just begins to
glow. The reducing flame is at the tip of the blue cone; do
not use "vortex" or turbulent-flow torch tips, as these eliminate the
distinction between oxidizing and reducing flame. Continue
heating the bead for about 30 seconds. Then turn off the torch flame
and note
whether any coating has formed on the carbon block. If so, note the
color while
it's still hot. A. Fireproof work surface. B. Fireproof block or steel bar to elevate distal end of carbon block C. Carbon block. Do not elevate too steeply or it could slide off the work surface. D. Depression or shallow hole in block; put mineral sample here. E. Propane torch 6.) Let the block cool for at least 20-30 minutes. If for some reason you must move it while it's still hot, use crucible tongs and wear thick gloves. If you had the block held at an angle by a non-flammable support, set it flat again when it's cool so the drop-tests won't roll off. It is best to use the tongs in case the block should still be hot. A.)
If
possible2,
use a razor blade or
the
forceps to scrape off the solidified fusion now that the block is cool.
Try
dampening a tiny piece of this fusion and leaving it in contact with a
silver
spoon overnight. If it blackens the silver, then sulfide is present.
The
original sample therefore contained sulfur, but only if all your
reagents
were sulfur-free (hence, only the carbonate fusion would work for
this, not
the bisulfate). If you're not certain, run a "blank" using just the
reagents and no mineral sample. B.) Put the
fusion in a test
tube and add about 1 mL of distilled water. Heat the test tube
cautiously over
a burner flame, moving the tube back and forth over the flame
to prevent
rapid boiling. Use an inert boiling chip
if available. When the first bubbles appear, stop heating and set
aside to
cool. C.)
If a coating did form on the block, note its color when cool.
If the coating
is white or nearly-white, try a separate test using a "blank"
composed of just the flux (no mineral sample). Do you still get a white
coating? Why or why not? What might this coating be made of? (Hint: See
if it
dissolves in a few drops of water. Try testing this with a bit of pH
paper.
Does it give an alkaline reaction with turmeric paper? How about its
flame-test
coloration?)7.) Watch the test tube from step 6B. Note any precipitate that forms. If you see some tiny, white crystals that settle to the bottom, try to determine their shape with a magnifier. A.)
If crystals
did form, try to get one of them to stick to your platinum wire loop.
Test it
in the burner flame and note what color, if any, is imparted to the
flame. B.)
Do the white
crystals dissolve in an excess of hydrochloric acid? Why or why not? If
they do dissolve, what happens when you add ammonium sulfate or
dilute
sulfuric acid to this solution?Discussion While
sodium carbonate is usually used for fusions instead of potassium
carbonate,
the potassium salt has the advantage of not contaminating the flame
test with
yellow. The delicate mauve hue of the potassium flame does not obscure
other
colors as obnoxiously as the yellow of sodium. Carbonate
fusions work
well in most cases, especially for silicates; roasting an
alkali carbonate produces the caustic hydroxide, which attacks
silica readily. However, if our unidentified sample happens to
something
which resists the carbonate flux, a fusion with 2 parts potassium
bisulfate and
one part potassium nitrate will most likely do the trick. A sample
the author
tested, which was thought to be barite, failed to give the greenish
flame
test
during step 3; in fact, it colored the flame yellow with a touch
of red
(yellow
from sodium, red probably from calcium3).
Uncertain if these colors were due to
microscopic impurities4,
the
author
then went through the procedure outlined above. However, he skipped the
carbonate fusion and went right for the bisulfate-nitrate flux. The
sample,
when treated this way, gave white crystals at step 7 and a nearly
pure-green
flame test at step 7A. The fusion
of the sample
and dissolution in water will carry barium, calcium, and sodium
sulfates into
solution. Of these three, barium sulfate (barite) is only
"temporarily" soluble- that is, it went into solution because of the
strong, hot sulfuric acid released during the fusion; putting this in
water and
diluting it caused barite to re-precipitate, leaving the sodium and
calcium
ions in solution. This re-precipitated barium sulfate then gave a
decent flame
test. One might
wonder why the
original barite sample wasn't simply soaked in hydrochloric acid (to
clean it)
and then flame-tested. This can certainly be done, but the fusion is
carried
out in case further analysis is desired. The sample might also have
embedded
bits of other minerals such as Ca / Na silicates, some of which might
not be
soluble in hydrochloric acid. The fusion takes care of this. The
nitrate-bisulfate
flux is worth commenting on in more detail. It provides an extremely
harsh
chemical environment when heat is applied to it. This
fusion must be done in a very well-ventilated area, preferably
outdoors. A face
shield or goggles are essential in case the mixture spatters off the
block. Molten bisulfate, combined with the water
released
when the
crystals first melt, provides sulfuric acid; heating this with the
potassium
nitrate yields nitric acid and nitrogen oxides. Some sulfur trioxide
undoubtedly forms as well. These make for a corrosive, reactive mixture
that
will attack some of the most recalcitrant minerals. These HNO3 /
NOx / SO3
fumes are poisonous and extremely corrosive, but the procedure uses
only
tiny amounts of reagent and is, of course, performed in a
well-ventilated
area. Mineral
tests are best
done with some idea of what the sample might be. If you've narrowed
your
unknown down to only two or three possibilities, it will be much easier
to pick
a procedure. As always, start with the easiest and least-destructive
tests
first. Try not to use up your whole mineral sample in one place,
just in case you need to do additional tests.1 Try to obtain laboratory- or reagent-grade potassium nitrate (likewise for the potassium bisulfate). Technical- and commerce-grade potassium salts nearly always contain enough sodium to contaminate flame tests and obscure the delicate mauve color that potassium imparts. U.S.P. grade material contains enough sodium to give yellow flashes, but there's not usually enough Na to hide the potassium flame coloration entirely. Traditionally, a piece of cobalt glass was used to help visualize the mauve flame of potassium; all other flame colors would be nearly invisible. Back to article 2 In some cases the fusion is so difficult to break that it's better to get a sample of it by partially dissolving it in water. This is easily accomplished by putting a drop or two of distilled water on it, letting it sit for a moment, and taking up this liquid in a dropper. Also, the liquid may help loosen the bead from the carbon block. Don't try to force a stubborn fusion from the block by brute force; use water to soften it, collecting any runoff for further analysis. Back to article 3 Lithium and strontium will cause a similar crimson to red flame coloration, but calcium is by far the most common in minerals. If you suspect lithium or strontium, further tests are necessary. It also helps to know what elements are abundant where your mineral sample was found. One might expect lithium from something found in lepidolite- and spodumene-rich pegmatites, for example. Back to article 4 The yellow and red flame colorations could have come from tiny bits of calcite and miniscule droplets of sweat clinging to the mineral. An amount of sweat so tiny as to be invisible, clinging to the sample after handling with the fingers, will cause a persistent sodium flame. Back to article Copyright Back to the Articles & Experiments Index CR Scientific Catalog Main Page |